The C4 has up to 3dB semi-broad peak in the mid treble band. The omni capsule is also flatter response, about +/- 1.5dB, from 50Hz-15kHz, on the B-5, with two narrow peaks, one about 1.5dB and the other about 2dB in magnitude, in the mid-treble. ![]() The C4 has substantial, wide 5 dB peak in the treble with the cardoid, while the B-5's cardoid is relatively flat, within a couple of dBs, through the entire bandwidth. The B-5 has a flatter response, with both the omni and cardoid capsules. ![]() The B-5 has better machine work(C4 has sloppier threads, edges, etc.). I have inspected/analyzed/measured both microphones under heavily controlled conditions. But I have the answer to the thread if anyone wants to know the truth. I take it that raising the ceiling is out of You considered a pair of omnis? The AT4051 also is a pretty good cardioid The wide pattern works better for me on drum >The main reason I'll put up a MXL-603s sometimes is because of the wide cardiod I don't use them and probably should sell them. >couple of MXL-63M's (Mars) cheap and the electronics in them were similiar to >I did mod my MXL-V67G and that was an improvement. Problems that I decided it wasn't worth spending a lot of time on the I have not done the SDs at all, mostly because they have enough capsule ![]() >when he was with Marshall and he cleaned them up (noise) and sent me back a >Did you do the Dorsey Mods on the MXL603?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |